Wednesday, July 15, 2009

The Middle East's Forgotten Kurds

Although they number 30 million, you will rarely read of persecution against the Kurds in the world's leading English language newspapers: No mention of the "plight of the Kurds", no mention of pogroms against the Kurds, and no mention of efforts to purge the Kurds of their cultural identity.

In Thomas Friedman's op-ed, "Goodbye Iraq, and Good Luck", in The New York Times of today's date, he describes a meeting in Kirkuk that Mike Mullen, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, held with provincial leaders - Sunnis, Kurds, Turkmen and Christians. My online comment, which will no doubt be lost in an ocean of vituperation vented at Friedman, focuses on the Kurds:

Friedman tells us that Iraqis "still have not figured out whom they want to be as a country." Friedman also highlights the joke told by the Kurdish representative at the meeting with Mike Mullen.

The Kurds? President Obama did not dare mention them when he gave his June speech on the Middle East in Cairo, which called for a "new beginning", because any such reference would have antagonized Turkey; the Sunni elite in Iraq; Iran, which is the object of overtures by Obama; and Syria, with which the Obama administration is seeking lines of communication.

There are some 30 million Kurds living in Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria, and although they have long sought their independence, they have been oppressed and ignored.

In Turkey, where the Kurds comprise 20% of the population, they have been categorized as "Mountain Turks" and "Eastern Turks" to disguise their identity. Over the years, they have been relocated, their language has been banned, they have lived under martial law, and their revolts have been suppressed.

In Iraq, where the Kurds amount to 17% of the population, they have suffered deportation and mass murder. Saddam's "Anfal" campaign against Kurds in 1988 resulted in the destruction of thousands of Kurd villages and the death of almost 100,000 Kurd civilians.

In Iran, where the Kurds total 7% of the population, they have long struggled to maintain their ethnic identity and achieve autonomy. After the Iranian revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini declared a "holy war" against Kurdish rebels. Kurdish human rights activists continue to be murdered and imprisoned.

In Syria, where the Kurds comprise 9% of the population, the Syrian government has at various times banned the use of Kurdî, the Kurdish language, and taken many other actions, including the banning of books written in Kurdî, in order to deprive the Kurds of their ethnic identity.

Peace talks along the lines of Dayton? An interesting idea, but first it will be necessary to acknowledge the identity and aspirations of the Middle East's Kurds.

In 1991 Iraqi troops sought to quell a Kurdish uprising in northern Iraq; however, the U.S. and the U.K. responded with Operation Provide Comfort and Operation Northern Watch, creating a no-fly zone aimed at protecting the Kurds from Saddam's vengeance. In 2003 the Kurds greeted American troops in northern Iraq with jubilation.

Iraq's Kurds have enjoyed some measure of autonomy since 1992 and will be unlikely to accept anything that might compromise that freedom. Should Obama continue to reach out to Iran and Syria, let us hope that such overtures to repressive regimes will not come at the expense of the Kurds.

6 comments:

  1. It seems, you know a lot about kurds. Why do they have conflicts with everybody? Is it because in tribal Middle East everybody has conflicts with everybody else? People, who look like victims and fight for "freedom", are not necessarily innocent victims. Palestinians are the proof of it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Marina,

    Your questions are thought provoking.

    I do not speak Kurdî, and I do not claim expertise. However, I know of no other cohesive ethnic group numbering 30 million without their own state.

    The Palestinians were offered statehood in 1948, and again, in recent years, by Barak and Olmert; however, these opportunities were rejected.

    Statehood has never been offered to the Kurds. When France and Britain carved up the Ottoman Empire after World War I, new national boundaries failed to take into account the identity or desires of the Kurds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jeffrey,

    Since you do not mind, I continue.
    If we put individual rights above right of groups,
    why do we care about importance of having a national state for a large nation? Nationalism brings death and destruction, sacrificing people to the idea of national power. I can not recall a case, when these sacrifices were justified.

    For example, in my understanding, nationalism drives Palestinians. Defence of individual rights of citizens to live and preserve own culture drives Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, James.

    Although the Tamils do not have their own country, Tamil Nadu ("Country of the Tamils") is one of India's 28 states, which is home to most of India's 61 million Tamils. They have their own Governor, Chief Minister, legislature and courts. Unlike the 3 million Tamils in Sri Lanka, there is little talk of secession among India's Tamils.

    Compare this situation with that of the Kurds. Will the Kurds agree to a federal system in Iraq?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Marina,

    Such a difficult issue you have posed, which has been debated by countless Zionist congresses.

    In a nutshell, I believe that anti-Semitism is still rife throughout the world, and Israel is the one country serving as a safe harbor for the Jews. Without Israel, many of the world's Jews would have continued to suffer abhorrent persecution.

    What drives the Palestinians? Unfortunately, at least in Gaza, they are serving Iran as pawns. In the West Bank, e.g., in Nablus, they are seeing that there are many economic incentives inherent in peace.

    ReplyDelete